|
| Physarum elegans Schwein., Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., new ser. 4(2):257 (1832) [see pdf] ["1834"] [Rostafinski, Sluzowce Monogr. 115. 1874, suggests that it may be a Badhamia. Both Berlese and Massee recognize it under Physarum but add nothing to the original description. It is rejected as doubtful in the second and third editions of the Lister monograph. The type should be studied (apud Martin & Alexopoulos, Myxomycetes 340. 1969)] |