|
Didymium ramosum Duby, Bot. gall., ed. 2,
2:859
(1830)
[hide pdf]
[Duby suggests it may be Diderma ramosum (J. F. Gmel.) Pers. Probably not valid, Shenzhen Code art. 36.1 (Melbourne Code art. 36.1, ICBN art. 34.1). G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3:259. 1825, says probably a fungus. See also Rostafinski, Sluzowce Monogr. 301, 305. 1875]
[pdf from Biblioteca Digital del Real Jardin Botánico, CSIC. Madrid] |