|
| Didymium ramosum Duby, Bot. gall., ed. 2, 2:859 (1830) [see pdf] [Duby suggests it may be Diderma ramosum (J. F. Gmel.) Pers. Probably not valid, Shenzhen Code art. 36.1 (Melbourne Code art. 36.1, ICBN art. 34.1). G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3:259. 1825, says probably a fungus. See also Rostafinski, Sluzowce Monogr. 301, 305. 1875] |